<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.7.1" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Carlo Torniai &#187; RDFa</title>
	<link>http://blog.carlotorniai.net</link>
	<description>The more we know the less we show</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 04:17:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>Semantic Web for the masses? - Part II</title>
		<description><![CDATA[In a previous post I’ve highlighted the need of  simple tools that can be easily accessed by a large number of users in order to
- ease the process of publishing and retrieving structured information
- show the value of having structured information on the web
Recently at Deri Giovanni Tummarello and his rsearch group has launched [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://blog.carlotorniai.net/semantic-web-for-the-masses-part-ii/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Semantic Web for the masses?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[A very interesting discussion is going on in a  long thread started in the Linked Data Publc mailing list.
The main point   is about what are the barriers that prevents the Semantic Web to spread and what it has to be done to make it easy for non-researcher to create, publish and use RDF [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://blog.carlotorniai.net/semantic-web-for-the-masses/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Google supports RDFa</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday Google announced the support of RDFa. I&#8217;m impressed by the power of the big G because Yahoo Searchmonkey   has been supporting RDFa since long time and  they never made such a breakthrough in the news. There are pros and cons in the current Google approach as Ian Davis point out here. I think that  it&#8217;s a [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://blog.carlotorniai.net/google-supports-rdfa/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>

